Case Study

The Shovel Business Bought at Gold-Rush Prices

What happened

Scotts sold equipment to cannabis growers rather than growing anything, which kept it out of the legal risk and in the boom. Hawthorne's net sales went from $640.6 million in 2019 to $1,023.1 million in 2020 and $1,424.2 million in 2021, with profit growing faster than sales, producing $330.3 million of cumulative segment profit across three years. In August 2021 a newly formed subsidiary bought a $150 million convertible note issued by a cannabis company, which put the balance sheet into the boom the income statement had been protected from. In 2022 net sales fell 49.7% on a 56% collapse in volume, and Scotts recorded $632.4 million of non-cash goodwill impairment.

DOCUMENTED: the Hawthorne Gardening segment of The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (NYSE: SMG), which sells hydroponic lighting, nutrients, growing media and equipment to cannabis cultivators. Built only from Scotts’ own Form 10-K filings for fiscal 2021 (filed 23 November 2021) and fiscal 2023 (filed 22 November 2023). Every segment figure below is disclosed in those filings. Scotts’ fiscal year ends 30 September.

  • Real company — documented history
  • Consumer products
  • Picks-and-shovels supplier
  • High risk
  • Failure
  • Advanced

The case, start to finish

Selling the shovels worked exactly as advertised. Buying the shovel business at gold-rush prices is what cost the money.

The cleanest version of a famous argument

Scotts Miracle-Gro's Hawthorne Gardening segment sells hydroponic lighting, nutrients, growing media and equipment to cannabis cultivators. It grows nothing itself, which keeps it clear of the plant-touching legal and tax exposure its customers live with, and it is paid at the point of build-out rather than at the point of harvest. That is the picks and shovels case stated about as well as it can be: exposure to the rate of capacity construction, rather than to the price of the commodity that capacity produces.

For three years it did exactly what the argument promises. Net sales went from $640.6 million in fiscal 2019 to $1,023.1 million in fiscal 2020 and $1,424.2 million in fiscal 2021. Segment profit went from $54.6 million to $111.9 million to $163.8 million, growing faster than sales each year. Three boom years produced $330.3 million of cumulative segment profit, earned while the customers were collectively building the oversupply that would eventually break their own prices. The supplier really did get paid first.

What to do with a boom's cash

That is the decision this case turns on, and it was made at the top of the cycle. Hawthorne bought HydroLogic and Rhizoflora in August 2021 and True Liberty Bags and Luxx Lighting that December, consolidating the category at prices set by peak-year numbers. It bought Cyco in April 2022, after the turn had already begun.

Then it went one step further. On 24 August 2021 a newly formed subsidiary, The Hawthorne Collective, bought a $150.0 million six-year convertible note issued by a listed cannabis investment firm, adding $25.0 million more in fiscal 2022. That is the step across the line, from selling shovels to owning claims.

Every one of those choices converted a flexible cash position into a carrying value, and a carrying value is something you have to defend in an impairment test the moment volume turns. Cash does not have to be defended. That difference is the entire second half of the story.

Why a supplier does not slow down, it stops

The revenue mix is the mechanism. Lights, ventilation and growing environments are one-time capital purchases for a grower. Nutrients and media reorder. So when build-out ends, the durable half of the revenue does not decelerate, it ends. Fiscal 2022 net sales fell 49.7% to $716.2 million on a 56.0% collapse in volume, and fiscal 2023 fell a further 34.8% to $467.3 million, 67.2% below the peak in two years.

The cause was the very risk the picks-and-shovels position was supposed to sidestep, arriving one step removed. Scotts' own fiscal 2023 risk factors describe an oversupply of cannabis that drove wholesale prices down significantly and reduced indoor and outdoor cultivation. Hawthorne never had to worry about the crop price directly. Its customers did, and demand for shovels is demand for the next hole.

$330.3 million earned, $750.1 million written off

Fiscal 2022 brought $632.4 million of non-cash pre-tax goodwill and intangible impairment on Hawthorne, $522.4 million of it goodwill. Fiscal 2023 added $117.7 million more of finite-lived intangible impairment, plus a $101.3 million other-than-temporary impairment on the convertible debt investments. Segment losses of $21.1 million and $48.1 million sit underneath all of that.

Set the write-downs against the $330.3 million the segment earned in the three good years and the shape of the mistake is unmistakable. The operating position was sound and the balance-sheet position was not. A roll-up priced off peak-cycle volume becomes an impairment charge the year volume falls, and that charge is not an accounting curiosity. It is the recorded gap between what the boom's cash bought and what those assets were worth once the boom stopped paying for them.

For anyone supplying somebody else's boom

The picks-and-shovels edge is real, and it is narrower than the slogan suggests. It protects your income statement from the boom. It does nothing at all to protect your balance sheet from the price you paid to get into the position.

So the practical test is where the boom's cash goes. Money taken out stays flexible and never has to be justified in a bad year. Money converted into goodwill, tooling, capacity or a stake in your own customers must be defended against a future you already know is cyclical, in a test run by people who will have the benefit of hindsight.

And if you are ever tempted to move closer to the thing your customers are betting on, be clear about what you are trading away. Not owning the crop was the whole structural protection, and it can only be given up once.

Timeline

  • FY2019 Hawthorne net sales $640.6 million; segment profit $54.6 million. Scotts sells equipment to growers rather than growing anything, which keeps it out of the plant-touching legal and tax exposure its customers live with.
  • FY2020 Net sales $1,023.1 million, up 59.7%. Segment profit $111.9 million, up 104.9%. Profit is growing almost twice as fast as sales.
  • FY2021 Net sales $1,424.2 million, up 39.2%. Segment profit $163.8 million, up 46.4%. Three boom years have produced $330.3 million of cumulative segment profit. Hawthorne keeps buying brands: HydroLogic and Rhizoflora in August 2021, True Liberty Bags and Luxx Lighting in December 2021.
  • 24 August 2021 A newly formed subsidiary, The Hawthorne Collective, buys a $150.0 million six-year convertible note issued by RIV Capital Inc., a listed cannabis investment firm, and it is the first step across the line from selling shovels to owning claims. A further $25.0 million follows in fiscal 2022.
  • FY2022 Net sales $716.2 million, down 49.7%, on a 56.0% collapse in volume. Segment loss of $21.1 million. Scotts records $632.4 million of non-cash pre-tax goodwill and intangible impairment on Hawthorne, being $522.4 million of goodwill and $110.0 million of finite-lived intangibles, following interim impairment testing. It buys Cyco in April 2022 anyway.
  • FY2023 Net sales $467.3 million, down a further 34.8%. Segment loss widens to $48.1 million. Another $117.7 million of finite-lived intangible impairment at Hawthorne, plus a $101.3 million other-than-temporary impairment on the convertible debt investments.

You're in the owner's chair

Fiscal 2021 has just closed. Your hydroponics segment did $1,424.2 million of sales and $163.8 million of segment profit, up from $640.6 million and $54.6 million two years ago. The cash is real. Brand owners in the category will sell to you, at prices set by these numbers. What do you do with the money?

  • Bank it. Take the boom’s cash out, buy nothing at these prices, and keep the balance sheet flexible
  • Consolidate the category now — buy the lighting, nutrient and equipment brands while the boom is paying for them
  • Move closer to the plant — put capital into cannabis operators themselves, where the growth and the multiples are

Hawthorne segment net sales by fiscal year

  • FY2019: 640.6 $M
  • FY2020: 1,023.1 $M
  • FY2021: 1,424.2 $M
  • FY2022: 716.2 $M
  • FY2023: 467.3 $M

From Scotts Miracle-Gro’s FY2021 and FY2023 Forms 10-K. The FY2022 fall of 49.7% was driven by a 56.0% drop in volume: customers stopped building, which for a supplier of lights and growing environments is not a slowdown but a stop.

Business model

Sell the equipment, not the crop. Growers need lights, nutrients, growing media, ventilation and benches whether or not any individual grower makes money, and the supplier gets paid at the point of build-out rather than at the point of harvest. It is the cleanest version of the picks-and-shovels argument: you are exposed to the rate of capacity construction, not to the price of the commodity that capacity produces.

Revenue model

Wholesale sales of durable hardware and consumable inputs through hydroponics distribution. The mix matters more than the volume: lights and growing environments are one-time capital purchases for a grower, while nutrients and media reorder. When build-out stops, the durable half of the revenue does not slow down, it stops, which is why FY2022 volume fell 56.0% in a single year.

Cost structure

Manufacturing and sourcing costs, distribution, and, decisively, the amortising cost of the brands Scotts bought to assemble the segment. That last line is why the segment was carrying $522.4 million of goodwill and enough finite-lived intangibles to absorb $110.0 million of impairment in FY2022 and another $117.7 million in FY2023.

Strategic challenge

The picks-and-shovels position protects you from one risk and not the other. Hawthorne never had to worry about wholesale cannabis prices directly. But its customers built capacity on the assumption those prices would hold, and Scotts’ own FY2023 risk factors say what happened next: sales volume decreased "due to an oversupply of cannabis, which has driven cannabis wholesale prices down significantly and has resulted in a decrease in indoor and outdoor cultivation." Demand for shovels is demand for the next hole, and the next hole is a bet on the price of gold.

Key decision

What to do with the boom’s cash. Scotts capitalised the boom instead of banking it, rolling up hydroponics brands through FY2021 and FY2022 at prices set by the peak, and then extending $175.0 million into convertible debt of a cannabis investment company. Every one of those decisions converted a flexible cash position into a fixed carrying value that had to be defended in an impairment test the moment volume turned.

What worked

The operating thesis, exactly as advertised, for three years. Hawthorne tripled sales between FY2019 and FY2021 and grew segment profit from $54.6 million to $163.8 million, a rise of 200%, while its customers were collectively building the oversupply that would break their own prices. The supplier really did get paid first, and really did avoid the plant-touching legal and tax exposure. Selling shovels worked.

What failed

The price paid to own the shovel business. Three boom years produced $330.3 million of cumulative segment profit. FY2022 alone produced $632.4 million of Hawthorne goodwill and intangible impairment, and FY2023 added $117.7 million more, so $750.1 million of write-downs against $330.3 million of profit, before the two segment losses totalling $69.2 million. The $175.0 million reach across into cannabis investment then produced a $101.3 million impairment of its own.

Risk factors

Customer capital spending that stops rather than slows; a durable-goods mix with no replacement cycle once build-out ends; roll-up acquisitions carried at peak-cycle goodwill; state-by-state licensing expansion that keeps adding supply; and the specific temptation, once a supplier is making money on a boom, to buy exposure to the boom itself.

Lesson summary

Picks-and-shovels is a real edge and a narrow one: it protects your income statement from the boom, not your balance sheet from its price. Selling equipment into the cannabis build-out earned Scotts $330.3 million in three years and cost it $750.1 million in Hawthorne write-downs in the two that followed. If you get the shovel position by buying it at boom multiples, you have quietly taken the miner’s risk with the supplier’s margin.

Key data

  • $640.6M Hawthorne net sales, FY2019
  • $1,424.2M Hawthorne net sales, FY2021 (peak)
  • $467.3M Hawthorne net sales, FY2023
  • 67.2% Peak-to-trough decline in two years
  • $54.6M + $111.9M + $163.8M = $330.3M Segment profit, FY2019 + FY2020 + FY2021
  • $(21.1)M and $(48.1)M Segment loss, FY2022 and FY2023
  • $632.4M ($522.4M goodwill + $110.0M intangibles) Hawthorne goodwill and intangible impairment, FY2022
  • $117.7M Hawthorne intangible impairment, FY2023
  • $150.0M (Aug 2021) + $25.0M (FY2022) Invested in RIV Capital convertible notes
  • $101.3M Convertible-debt impairment, FY2023

Sources & basis

The company here is real and named, and nothing about it was invented to make the story land. The list below is where each fact came from — public filings, court records, published reporting — so you can open a source and check it against the sentence that used it.

  1. The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, Form 10-K for fiscal 2021 — Hawthorne segment net sales of $640.6M (FY2019), $1,023.1M (FY2020) and $1,424.2M (FY2021); segment profit of $54.6M, $111.9M and $163.8M; the $33.7M Rhizoflora acquisition; and the $150.0 million RIV Capital convertible note of 24 August 2021 View source ↗
  2. The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, Form 10-K for fiscal 2023 — Hawthorne net sales of $716.2M (FY2022) and $467.3M (FY2023); segment losses of $21.1M and $48.1M; the FY2022 impairment of $632.4M ($522.4M goodwill and $110.0M finite-lived intangibles); the FY2023 Hawthorne intangible impairment of $117.7M and the $101.3M other-than-temporary impairment on convertible debt investments; the $25.0M additional RIV Capital payment; and the risk-factor language on cannabis oversupply and falling wholesale prices View source ↗
  3. The 67.2% peak-to-trough figure and the $330.3M, $69.2M and $750.1M totals are our own arithmetic on the segment figures disclosed above.